Quick/Comparisons
The Samsung Exynos 2600 takes the lead in gaming performance with a 20-point gap, thanks to its Samsung Xclipse 960 graphics.
The Xiaomi Xring O1 edges out the Samsung Exynos 2600 in battery life, boasting a 4-point lead.
Since neither product's AI performance was evaluated, we cannot declare a winner in this category.
94 | CPU Performance | 92 |
92 | Gaming Performance | 74 |
88 | Battery life |
Compare with something else?
Compare Samsung Exynos 2600 with another →92 |
| Samsung | Manufacturer | TSMC |
| 2 nanometers | Process Node | 3 nanometers |
| 10 | CPU Cores | 10 |
| Samsung Xclipse 960 | GPU Model | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 |
| AI engine with 32K MAC NPU | NPU Performance | Yes |
| 3145925 | Apple A19 | 2998904 |
| 1101529 | CPU | 956780 |
| 1130150 | GPU | 1006500 |
| 369235 | Memory | 409347 |
| 545011 | UX | 626277 |
| 3145925 | Total score | 2998904 |
| 3455 | Single-Core Score | 2746 |
| 11621 | Multi-Core Score | 8431 |
| 459.4 MB/sec | Asset compression | 332.8 MB/sec |
| 328.1 pages/sec | HTML 5 Browser | 236.9 pages/sec |
| 345 Mpixels/sec | PDF Renderer | 266 Mpixels/sec |
| 259.1 images/sec | Image detection | 208.8 images/sec |
| 344.2 Mpixels/sec | HDR | 262.9 Mpixels/sec |
| 41.7 images/sec | Background blur | 32.7 images/sec |
| 97.1 images/sec | Photo processing | 80.1 images/sec |
| 12.2 Mpixels/sec | Ray tracing | 8.25 Mpixels/sec |
| — | Samples | 4 tests |
| 27019 | Compute Score (GPU) | 21512 |
| 43.4 images/sec | Background blur | 42.3 images/sec |
| 20.2 images/sec | Face detection | 14.3 images/sec |
| 1.03 Gpixels/sec | Horizon detection | 0.9 Gpixels/sec |
| 1.41 Gpixels/sec | Edge detection | 1.15 Gpixels/sec |
| 2.05 Gpixels/sec | Gaussian blur | 1.72 Gpixels/sec |
| 0.28 Gpixels/sec | Feature matching | 0.22 Gpixels/sec |
| 95 Gpixels/sec | Stereo matching | 71.6 Gpixels/sec |
| 4524 FPS | Particle physics | 2977 FPS |
| Vulkan | API | Vulkan |
| 4 tests | Samples | 4 tests |
| 3108 | 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 2414 |
| 3108 | Score | 2414 |
| — | Stability | 92% |
| 23 FPS | Graphics test | 18 FPS |
| 12698 | 3DMark Solar Bay | 9022 |
| 12698 | Score | 9022 |
| 48 FPS | Graphics test | 34 FPS |
| 55 FPS | Section 1 | 37 FPS |
| 48 FPS | Section 2 | 35 FPS |
| 42 FPS | Section 3 | 31 FPS |
| 1x 3.8 GHz – C1-Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz – C1-Pro 6x 2.75 GHz – C1-Pro | Architecture | 2x 3.9 GHz – Cortex-X925 4x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-A725 2x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A725 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
| 10 | Cores | 10 |
| 3800 MHz | Frequency | 3900 MHz |
| ARMv9.3-A | Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A |
| 192 KB | L1 cache | — |
| 3 MB | L2 cache | — |
| 2 nanometers | Process | 3 nanometers |
| Samsung | Manufacturing | TSMC |
| LPDDR5X | Memory type | LPDDR5T |
| 5333 MHz | Memory frequency | 4800 MHz |
| 2x 32 Bit | Bus | 4x 16 Bit |
| 85.3 Gb/s | Max bandwidth | 76.8 Gb/s |
| 24 GB | Max size | 24 GB |
| Exynos 5410 | Modem | MediaTek T800 |
| — | 4G support | — |
| Yes | 5G support | Yes |
| Up to 14790 Mbps | Download speed | Up to 7900 Mbps |
| Up to 4900 Mbps | Upload speed | Up to 4200 Mbps |
| 7 | Wi-Fi | 7 |
| 6 | Bluetooth | 5.4 |
| GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| UFS 4.1 | Storage type | UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 |
| 1x 320MP | Max camera resolution | — |
| 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS | Video playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 | Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 | Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
| AI engine with 32K MAC NPU | Neural processor (NPU) | Yes |
| December 2025 | Announced | May 2025 |
| Flagship | Class | Flagship |
| S5E9965 | Model number | — |
| Samsung Xclipse 960 | GPU name | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 |
| RDNA 4 | Architecture | Valhall 5th gen |
| 980 MHz | GPU frequency | 1392 MHz |
| 8 | Pipelines | 16 |
| 128 | Shading units | 128 |
| 1024 | Total shaders | 2048 |
| 4014.1 Gigaflops | FLOPS | 5701.6 Gigaflops |