Quick/Comparisons
The Samsung Exynos 2600's strong gaming performance earns it the win, thanks to its significantly higher score of 92.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G takes the win with its excellent battery life, boasting a 1-point advantage over the Samsung Exynos 2600.
Since neither product's AI performance scores are provided, it's a tie by default.
35 | CPU Performance | 94 |
12 | Gaming Performance | 92 |
89 | Battery life |
Compare with something else?
Compare Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G with another →88 |
| Samsung | Manufacturer | Samsung |
| 5 nanometers | Process Node | 2 nanometers |
| 8 | CPU Cores | 10 |
| Adreno 642 | GPU Model | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
| Hexagon 770 | NPU Performance | AI engine with 32K MAC NPU |
| 782789 | Apple A19 | 3145925 |
| 304111 | CPU | 1101529 |
| 99905 | GPU | 1130150 |
| 148356 | Memory | 369235 |
| 230417 | UX | 545011 |
| 782789 | Total score | 3145925 |
| 1051 | Single-Core Score | 3455 |
| 2971 | Multi-Core Score | 11621 |
| 153.3 MB/sec | Asset compression | 459.4 MB/sec |
| 73.8 pages/sec | HTML 5 Browser | 328.1 pages/sec |
| 113.2 Mpixels/sec | PDF Renderer | 345 Mpixels/sec |
| 56.1 images/sec | Image detection | 259.1 images/sec |
| 92.7 Mpixels/sec | HDR | 344.2 Mpixels/sec |
| 10.6 images/sec | Background blur | 41.7 images/sec |
| 26.7 images/sec | Photo processing | 97.1 images/sec |
| 4.21 Mpixels/sec | Ray tracing | 12.2 Mpixels/sec |
| 3 tests | Samples | — |
| 2612 | Compute Score (GPU) | 27019 |
| 3.98 images/sec | Background blur | 43.4 images/sec |
| 1.58 images/sec | Face detection | 20.2 images/sec |
| 0.15 Gpixels/sec | Horizon detection | 1.03 Gpixels/sec |
| 0.18 Gpixels/sec | Edge detection | 1.41 Gpixels/sec |
| 0.19 Gpixels/sec | Gaussian blur | 2.05 Gpixels/sec |
| 0.02 Gpixels/sec | Feature matching | 0.28 Gpixels/sec |
| 7.63 Gpixels/sec | Stereo matching | 95 Gpixels/sec |
| 494.4 FPS | Particle physics | 4524 FPS |
| OpenCL | API | Vulkan |
| 2 tests | Samples | 4 tests |
| 289 | 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 3108 |
| 289 | Score | 3108 |
| 80% | Stability | — |
| 2 FPS | Graphics test | 23 FPS |
| — | 3DMark Solar Bay | 12698 |
| 834 | Score | 12698 |
| 4 FPS | Graphics test | 48 FPS |
| — | Section 1 | 55 FPS |
| — | Section 2 | 48 FPS |
| — | Section 3 | 42 FPS |
| 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78) 3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78) 4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55) | Architecture | 1x 3.8 GHz – C1-Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz – C1-Pro 6x 2.75 GHz – C1-Pro |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 2400 MHz | Frequency | 3800 MHz |
| ARMv8.2-A | Instruction set | ARMv9.3-A |
| — | L1 cache | 192 KB |
| 2 MB | L2 cache | 3 MB |
| 5 nanometers | Process | 2 nanometers |
| Samsung | Manufacturing | Samsung |
| LPDDR4X | Memory type | LPDDR5X |
| 2133 MHz | Memory frequency | 5333 MHz |
| 2x 16 Bit | Bus | 2x 32 Bit |
| 17 Gb/s | Max bandwidth | 85.3 Gb/s |
| 12 GB | Max size | 24 GB |
| X53 | Modem | Exynos 5410 |
| LTE Cat. 24 | 4G support | — |
| Yes | 5G support | Yes |
| Up to 3700 Mbps | Download speed | Up to 14790 Mbps |
| Up to 1600 Mbps | Upload speed | Up to 4900 Mbps |
| 6 | Wi-Fi | 7 |
| 5.2 | Bluetooth | 6 |
| GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0 | Storage type | UFS 4.1 |
| 1x 192MP | Max camera resolution | 1x 320MP |
| 4K at 30FPS | Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| 4K at 30FPS | Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 | Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
| Hexagon 770 | Neural processor (NPU) | AI engine with 32K MAC NPU |
| March 2021 | Announced | December 2025 |
| Mid range | Class | Flagship |
| SM7350-AB | Model number | S5E9965 |
| Adreno 642 | GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
| Adreno 600 | Architecture | RDNA 4 |
| 490 MHz | GPU frequency | 980 MHz |
| 2 | Pipelines | 8 |
| 256 | Shading units | 128 |
| 512 | Total shaders | 1024 |
| 752.6 Gigaflops | FLOPS | 4014.1 Gigaflops |