Quick/Comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2600 leads by a significant margin due to its high score of 92, making it the clear winner in this use case.
Both processors have excellent battery life, with Samsung Exynos 2600 edging out MediaTek Dimensity 820 by just 3 points, making them nearly tied in this use case.
Since neither processor's AI performance was evaluated, we cannot determine a winner in this use case.
29 | CPU Performance | 94 |
11 | Gaming Performance | 92 |
85 | Battery life |
Compare with something else?
Compare MediaTek Dimensity 820 with another →88 |
| TSMC | Manufacturer | Samsung |
| 7 nanometers | Process Node | 2 nanometers |
| 8 | CPU Cores | 10 |
| Mali-G57 MP5 | GPU Model | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
| MediaTek APU 3.0 | NPU Performance | AI engine with 32K MAC NPU |
| 609659 | Apple A19 | 3145925 |
| 230405 | CPU | 1101529 |
| 101179 | GPU | 1130150 |
| 101782 | Memory | 369235 |
| 176293 | UX | 545011 |
| 609659 | Total score | 3145925 |
| 839 | Single-Core Score | 3455 |
| 2312 | Multi-Core Score | 11621 |
| 107 MB/sec | Asset compression | 459.4 MB/sec |
| 59.9 pages/sec | HTML 5 Browser | 328.1 pages/sec |
| 95.3 Mpixels/sec | PDF Renderer | 345 Mpixels/sec |
| 40.7 images/sec | Image detection | 259.1 images/sec |
| 68.7 Mpixels/sec | HDR | 344.2 Mpixels/sec |
| 7.49 images/sec | Background blur | 41.7 images/sec |
| 20.4 images/sec | Photo processing | 97.1 images/sec |
| 2.79 Mpixels/sec | Ray tracing | 12.2 Mpixels/sec |
| Less than 3 | Samples | — |
| 2799 | Compute Score (GPU) | 27019 |
| 4.22 images/sec | Background blur | 43.4 images/sec |
| 2.29 images/sec | Face detection | 20.2 images/sec |
| 0.13 Gpixels/sec | Horizon detection | 1.03 Gpixels/sec |
| 0.22 Gpixels/sec | Edge detection | 1.41 Gpixels/sec |
| 0.13 Gpixels/sec | Gaussian blur | 2.05 Gpixels/sec |
| 0.03 Gpixels/sec | Feature matching | 0.28 Gpixels/sec |
| 8.16 Gpixels/sec | Stereo matching | 95 Gpixels/sec |
| 442.2 FPS | Particle physics | 4524 FPS |
| Vulkan | API | Vulkan |
| Less than 3 | Samples | 4 tests |
| — | 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 3108 |
| 716 | Score | 3108 |
| 97% | Stability | — |
| 4 FPS | Graphics test | 23 FPS |
| — | 3DMark Solar Bay | 12698 |
| — | Score | 12698 |
| — | Graphics test | 48 FPS |
| — | Section 1 | 55 FPS |
| — | Section 2 | 48 FPS |
| — | Section 3 | 42 FPS |
| 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 | Architecture | 1x 3.8 GHz – C1-Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz – C1-Pro 6x 2.75 GHz – C1-Pro |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 2600 MHz | Frequency | 3800 MHz |
| ARMv8.3-A | Instruction set | ARMv9.3-A |
| 512 KB | L1 cache | 192 KB |
| 1 MB | L2 cache | 3 MB |
| 7 nanometers | Process | 2 nanometers |
| TSMC | Manufacturing | Samsung |
| LPDDR4X | Memory type | LPDDR5X |
| 2133 MHz | Memory frequency | 5333 MHz |
| 2x 16 Bit | Bus | 2x 32 Bit |
| 17.07 Gb/s | Max bandwidth | 85.3 Gb/s |
| 16 GB | Max size | 24 GB |
| — | Modem | Exynos 5410 |
| LTE Cat. 18 | 4G support | — |
| Yes | 5G support | Yes |
| Up to 2770 Mbps | Download speed | Up to 14790 Mbps |
| Up to 1250 Mbps | Upload speed | Up to 4900 Mbps |
| 5 | Wi-Fi | 7 |
| 5.1 | Bluetooth | 6 |
| GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| UFS 2.2 | Storage type | UFS 4.1 |
| 1x 80MP, 2x 32MP | Max camera resolution | 1x 320MP |
| 4K at 30FPS | Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| 4K at 30FPS | Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 | Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 | Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
| MediaTek APU 3.0 | Neural processor (NPU) | AI engine with 32K MAC NPU |
| May 2020 | Announced | December 2025 |
| Mid range | Class | Flagship |
| MT6875 | Model number | S5E9965 |
| Mali-G57 MP5 | GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
| Valhall 1st gen | Architecture | RDNA 4 |
| 900 MHz | GPU frequency | 980 MHz |
| 5 | Pipelines | 8 |
| 32 | Shading units | 128 |
| 160 | Total shaders | 1024 |
| 288 Gigaflops | FLOPS | 4014.1 Gigaflops |