Quick/Comparisons
The Samsung Exynos 2600 leads by a significant margin, thanks to its strong gaming performance and Samsung Xclipse 960 graphics.
Both processors deliver excellent battery life, with the Samsung Exynos 2600 edging out the HiSilicon Kirin 8000 by a narrow margin.
The HiSilicon Kirin 8000 features a dedicated NPU for AI workloads, giving it a clear advantage in this use case.
33 | CPU Performance | 94 |
12 | Gaming Performance | 92 |
81 | Battery life |
Compare with something else?
Compare HiSilicon Kirin 8000 with another →88 |
| SMIC | Manufacturer | Samsung |
| 7 nanometers | Process Node | 2 nanometers |
| 8 | CPU Cores | 10 |
| — | GPU Model | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
| Yes | NPU Performance | AI engine with 32K MAC NPU |
| 829838 | Apple A19 | 3145925 |
| 289220 | CPU | 1101529 |
| 111855 | GPU | 1130150 |
| 202037 | Memory | 369235 |
| 226726 | UX | 545011 |
| 829838 | Total score | 3145925 |
| 937 | Single-Core Score | 3455 |
| 2598 | Multi-Core Score | 11621 |
| 129.7 MB/sec | Asset compression | 459.4 MB/sec |
| 58.5 pages/sec | HTML 5 Browser | 328.1 pages/sec |
| 87.7 Mpixels/sec | PDF Renderer | 345 Mpixels/sec |
| 49.9 images/sec | Image detection | 259.1 images/sec |
| 77.9 Mpixels/sec | HDR | 344.2 Mpixels/sec |
| 7.98 images/sec | Background blur | 41.7 images/sec |
| 23.6 images/sec | Photo processing | 97.1 images/sec |
| 3.69 Mpixels/sec | Ray tracing | 12.2 Mpixels/sec |
| 3 tests | Samples | — |
| 3028 | Compute Score (GPU) | 27019 |
| 4.24 images/sec | Background blur | 43.4 images/sec |
| 2.43 images/sec | Face detection | 20.2 images/sec |
| 0.17 Gpixels/sec | Horizon detection | 1.03 Gpixels/sec |
| 0.24 Gpixels/sec | Edge detection | 1.41 Gpixels/sec |
| 0.13 Gpixels/sec | Gaussian blur | 2.05 Gpixels/sec |
| 0.04 Gpixels/sec | Feature matching | 0.28 Gpixels/sec |
| 6.71 Gpixels/sec | Stereo matching | 95 Gpixels/sec |
| 601.9 FPS | Particle physics | 4524 FPS |
| Vulkan | API | Vulkan |
| 2 tests | Samples | 4 tests |
| 314 | 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 3108 |
| 314 | Score | 3108 |
| 98% | Stability | — |
| 2 FPS | Graphics test | 23 FPS |
| — | 3DMark Solar Bay | 12698 |
| — | Score | 12698 |
| — | Graphics test | 48 FPS |
| — | Section 1 | 55 FPS |
| — | Section 2 | 48 FPS |
| — | Section 3 | 42 FPS |
| 1x 2.4 GHz – 1xA77 H 3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L 4x 1.84 GHz – A55 | Architecture | 1x 3.8 GHz – C1-Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz – C1-Pro 6x 2.75 GHz – C1-Pro |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 2400 MHz | Frequency | 3800 MHz |
| ARMv8.2-A | Instruction set | ARMv9.3-A |
| — | L1 cache | 192 KB |
| — | L2 cache | 3 MB |
| 7 nanometers | Process | 2 nanometers |
| SMIC | Manufacturing | Samsung |
| LPDDR5 | Memory type | LPDDR5X |
| 3200 MHz | Memory frequency | 5333 MHz |
| 4x 16 Bit | Bus | 2x 32 Bit |
| 51.2 Gb/s | Max bandwidth | 85.3 Gb/s |
| 12 GB | Max size | 24 GB |
| Balong | Modem | Exynos 5410 |
| — | 4G support | — |
| Yes | 5G support | Yes |
| — | Download speed | Up to 14790 Mbps |
| — | Upload speed | Up to 4900 Mbps |
| 7 | Wi-Fi | 7 |
| 6 | Bluetooth | 6 |
| GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 | Storage type | UFS 4.1 |
| — | Max camera resolution | 1x 320MP |
| 4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS | Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| 4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS | Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 | Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
| Yes | Neural processor (NPU) | AI engine with 32K MAC NPU |
| October 2024 | Announced | December 2025 |
| Mid range | Class | Flagship |
| — | Model number | S5E9965 |
| — | GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
| — | Architecture | RDNA 4 |
| 864 MHz | GPU frequency | 980 MHz |
| — | Pipelines | 8 |
| — | Shading units | 128 |
| — | Total shaders | 1024 |
| 442.3 Gigaflops | FLOPS | 4014.1 Gigaflops |