Quick/Comparisons
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 takes the lead in gaming due to its slightly higher single-core performance, which is crucial for smooth gaming experiences.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 excels in creative workloads thanks to its higher multi-core performance, making it better suited for tasks like video editing and 3D modeling.
Both processors have identical power efficiency scores, indicating they are equally efficient in terms of power consumption.
83 | Single-Core Performance | 85 |
58 | Multi-Core Performance | 68 |
74 | Power Efficiency | 74 |
72 | QucikComparison Final Score | 77 |
| 14 | Cores | 24 |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 3 nm | Transistor size | 3 nm |
| 127 | Cinebench 2024 (Single) | 133 |
| 1228 | Cinebench 2024 (Multi) | 1508 |
| 2967 | Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 3134 |
| 17838 | Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 20165 |
| 1370 MB/sec | File compression | 1380 MB/sec |
| 144.6 Klines/sec | Clang compilation | 221 Klines/sec |
| 421.5 pages/sec | HTML 5 Browser | 407 pages/sec |
| 487.4 Mpixels/sec | PDF Renderer | 501.6 Mpixels/sec |
| 332.5 pages/sec | Text processing | 356.4 pages/sec |
| 84.8 images/sec | Background blur | 81.2 images/sec |
| 153.9 images/sec | Photo processing | 141.3 images/sec |
| 29.6 Mpixels/sec | Ray tracing | 47.2 Mpixels/sec |
| 4513 | Passmark CPU (Single-Core) | — |
| 39993 | Passmark CPU (Multi-Core) | — |
| 93.6 GOps/sec | Integer math | — |
| 124.9 GOps/sec | Floating point math | — |
| 384M Primes/sec | Find prime numbers | — |
| 50M Strings/sec | Random string sorting | — |
| 31.2 GBytes/sec | Data encryption | — |
| 417.5 MBytes/sec | Data compression | — |
| 2677 Frames/sec | Physics | — |
| 34.9B Matrices/sec | Extended instructions | — |
| 295.21 | Blender CPU | — |
| 18.9 PPW | Cinebench 2024 / Watt | 23.2 PPW |
| 274.4 PPW | Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt | 310.2 PPW |
| 615.3 PPW | Passmark CPU Mark / Watt | — |
| 4.54 PPW | Blender / Watt | — |
| — | [Performance Cores] | — |
| 6 | P-Cores | 8 |
| 6 | P-Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Frequency (P) | 2.5 GHz |
| — | [Efficient Cores] | — |
| 8 | E-Cores | 16 |
| 8 | E-Threads | 16 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Frequency (E) | 1.9 GHz |
| — | [Total] | — |
| 14 | Total Cores | 24 |
| 14 | Total Threads | 24 |
| 34x | Multiplier | 25x |
| 192K (per core) | L1 Cache | 192K (per core) |
| 3MB (per core) | L2 Cache | 3MB (per core) |
| No | Unlocked Multiplier | No |
| Intel Arc Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel Arc Graphics |
| 2000 MHz | GPU Boost Clock | 2000 MHz |
| — | Shading Units | — |
| — | TMUs | — |
| — | ROPs | — |
| — | Execution Units | — |
| — | iGPU FLOPS | — |
| - DDR5-6400 | Memory Types | - DDR5-6400 |
| 256 GB | Max. Memory Size | 256 GB |
| 2 | Memory Channels | 2 |
| — | Max. Memory Bandwidth | — |
| No | ECC Support | Yes |
| Intel | Vendor | Intel |
| December 18, 2024 | Released | December 18, 2024 |
| Desktop | Type | Desktop |
| x86-64 | Instruction Set | x86-64 |
| Arrow Lake | Codename | Arrow Lake |
| 235 | Model number | 285 |
| Arc Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics |
| — | Qualcomm Equivalent | — |
| — | Transistors | — |
| 3 nm | Fabrication Process | 3 nm |
| 65 W | TDP (PL1) | 65 W |
| FCLGA-1851 | Socket | FCLGA-1851 |
| 105°C | Peak Temperature | 105°C |
Compare with something else?
Compare Intel Core Ultra with another →