Quick/Comparisons
The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H takes the lead in gaming due to its higher single-core performance and better iGPU. Its higher single-core score gives it a slight edge in gaming workloads.
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D excels in creative workloads with its capable multi-core performance and higher benchmark scores. Its multi-core score is significantly higher than the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H.
The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H leads in power efficiency due to its high efficiency score and hybrid design. Its efficiency score is significantly higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D.
81 | Single-Core Performance | 84 |
69 | Multi-Core Performance | 58 |
61 | Power Efficiency | 84 |
28 | Integrated Graphics | 99 |
76 | QucikComparison Final Score | 75 |
| 12 | Cores | 16 |
| 120 W | TDP | 15-25 W (configurable) |
| 5 nm | Transistor size | 2 nm |
| 116 | Cinebench 2024 (Single) | 130 |
| 1529 | Cinebench 2024 (Multi) | 1324 |
| 3024 | Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 3026 |
| 18277 | Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 17545 |
| 1710 MB/sec | File compression | 1490 MB/sec |
| 170.3 Klines/sec | Clang compilation | 141.1 Klines/sec |
| 353.7 pages/sec | HTML 5 Browser | 477.4 pages/sec |
| 495.8 Mpixels/sec | PDF Renderer | 539.5 Mpixels/sec |
| 301.6 pages/sec | Text processing | 323.1 pages/sec |
| 68.4 images/sec | Background blur | 61.5 images/sec |
| 118.8 images/sec | Photo processing | 177.3 images/sec |
| 36.7 Mpixels/sec | Ray tracing | 28.4 Mpixels/sec |
| 4120 | Passmark CPU (Single-Core) | 4367 |
| 50223 | Passmark CPU (Multi-Core) | 36317 |
| 160.2 GOps/sec | Integer math | 90.6 GOps/sec |
| 96.9 GOps/sec | Floating point math | 112.3 GOps/sec |
| 443M Primes/sec | Find prime numbers | 381M Primes/sec |
| 70.9M Strings/sec | Random string sorting | 48.7M Strings/sec |
| 35.2 GBytes/sec | Data encryption | 30 GBytes/sec |
| 592.5 MBytes/sec | Data compression | 392.3 MBytes/sec |
| 4707 Frames/sec | Physics | 3460 Frames/sec |
| 44.5B Matrices/sec | Extended instructions | 32.9B Matrices/sec |
| 400.33 | Blender CPU | 297.18 |
| 12.7 PPW | Cinebench 2024 / Watt | 53 PPW |
| 152.3 PPW | Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt | 701.8 PPW |
| 418.5 PPW | Passmark CPU Mark / Watt | 1452.7 PPW |
| 3.34 PPW | Blender / Watt | 11.89 PPW |
| — | [Performance Cores] | — |
| 12 | P-Cores | 4 |
| 24 | P-Threads | 4 |
| 4.4 GHz | Base Frequency (P) | 2.1 GHz |
| — | [Efficient Cores] | — |
| — | E-Cores | 12 |
| — | E-Threads | 12 |
| — | Base Frequency (E) | 1.6 GHz |
| — | [Total] | — |
| 12 | Total Cores | 16 |
| 24 | Total Threads | 16 |
| 44x | Multiplier | 21x |
| 64K (per core) | L1 Cache | 192K (per core) |
| 1MB (per core) | L2 Cache | 2560K (per core) |
| — | Unlocked Multiplier | No |
| Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | Integrated Graphics | Intel Arc B390 |
| 2200 MHz | GPU Boost Clock | 2500 MHz |
| 128 | Shading Units | 1536 |
| 8 | TMUs | 48 |
| 4 | ROPs | 24 |
| 2 | Execution Units | 12 |
| 0.6 TFLOPS | iGPU FLOPS | 7.7 TFLOPS |
| - DDR5-5200 | Memory Types | - LPDDR5X-9600 |
| 192 GB | Max. Memory Size | 96 GB |
| 2 | Memory Channels | 2 |
| — | Max. Memory Bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC Support | No |
| Amd | Vendor | Intel |
| January 4, 2023 | Released | January 5, 2026 |
| Desktop | Type | Laptop |
| x86-64 | Instruction Set | x86-64 |
| Zen 4 (Raphael) | Codename | Panther Lake |
| — | Model number | 388H |
| Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | Integrated GPU | Arc B390 |
| — | Qualcomm Equivalent | — |
| 13.1 billions | Transistors | — |
| 5 nm | Fabrication Process | 2 nm |
| 120 W | TDP (PL1) | 15-25 W (configurable) |
| AM5 | Socket | FCBGA2540 |
| 89°C | Peak Temperature | 100°C |
Compare with something else?
Compare AMD Ryzen 9 with another →